Following some discussion of the first aspect (see Previous link above), the second aspect of the what little we know of the 1-, 2- and 3-D worlds is that it might be a mis-matched concept after all. As outlined the previous blog, there is so much of an individual that when they pass away, only a 3-D model can best represent those facets of that individual, e.g., their feelings, relationships, even those ideas-physical “things” such as possessions and what the “possession” possess.
For example, the person owns / owned a kayak; even a will or such alternative arrangement exists / existed for the ownership of this posession to change to another person(s), the ideas-physical of such an item is about the person itself.
This ideas-physical is of the person within a 3-D world. That is a simplistic statement of two aspects assumed:
- The person lives / lived in a 3-D world, and
- The ideas-physical relations can / could / are / have been / would / will be exercised in the 3-D world.
However, that is in as far as we perceive it. We as the person, his close family and loved ones, and those of any other who have no relations to this person.
And so?
The above is a crude representation of, a bad attempt at, saying that 3-D is what we know but our whole being is operating beyond 3-D.
It might be an easy thing to say but takes time to avoid confusions that could lead us to “stepping our own toes”: we live in dynamic, multi-dimensional environments (3D and beyond) much of which we are yet to understand, or will never realise in our present form, from which we attempt to project understanding, which in itself prevents us realising the wider dimension of properties of that environments.
In relatively practical terms, it might mean that we are not able to realise the world of the spiritual including those who have passed away. Or to be more politically correct, our capacity is limited in that knowing. That limited capacity could well be the result of the fall recorded in the early chapters of Genesis.
Pain is something we associate in negative ways, and central to how many of us feel when somebody dear to us passes away. It is one entity that, as we think of it from our existing environments, we will not have to undergo in the afterlife. More on this in the next blog.
